-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
New scheme to manipulate voting:
www.zerohedge.com
NPR Reveals Democrat Scheme To Rig AIs Into Deceiving Voters<!-- --> | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Why do you care being from Croatia?New scheme to manipulate voting:
NPR Reveals Democrat Scheme To Rig AIs Into Deceiving Voters<!-- --> | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Because it's wise to know how people obsessed with power function.
Also, Trump is bloody reason I'm not in some fox hole in Ukraine. And with active WW3 involving China too.
Also, Western globalists are trying to further federalize Europe from union of independent state. I don't want that. EU is new version of USSR. Also, something Trump is blocking.
And Trump blocking censorship powers. This forum risk being removed from existence if Democrats take power in USA again.
They will flood country with immigrants, stuff Supreme court with their judges and change voting laws to one USA one party state. This will enable EU to go full tyranicaly mode.
So only sort of free countries with Western civilization will be Argentina and El Salvador. Which will be besieged and pressurized.
Last edited:
You have such a strong positive outlook...
I...I have been mention in conversations I don't particularly remember and have zero context in at this hour of the morning.
No clue what is being discussed and significantly less idea why I am being included in the party.
As the guy who is the ultimate expression of the gen x meme, I prefer not to be mentioned in my absence.
Somewhat mystified at the idea that anyone could influence me to believe as any particular other group ideas. I simply do not work that way. I can not express this strongly enough. I do not think like anyone here. That is not a statement about faith. It is literal. It is in large part neurological but there is a significant amount of personal prior if that helps at all.
It strikes me and not for the first time mind you, that the text environment simply is not up to the task of giving one a genuine read on another.
In the end, the chances of anyone here being able to influence my opinion on anything in a supernatural rhelm is not worth considering.
As it happens, I have zero objection to prayer and always appreciate when I am included in that party...just so long as it does not require my participation in another's ritual with steps I don't know. Prefer to be prayed for than to be asked to participate. Then again, I love a good sing song or going to a dance...just don't try to get me to sing or to dance. I will or will not participate of my own accord.
Ugh now I want to find a pub with a bit of a sing song...maybe a Guinness.
Shall I list all the verses in the New Testament where we are commanded to preach the gospel. The plan is not so secret! If you would spend more time reading the Scriptures, and less time trying to reason without the Scriptures, you would know about the plan!
Yet you yourself did say that you wish you had the faith that the rest of us have. I have directed you to the evidence, but I simply cannot make you investigate it.
What plan? I still don't know.
I assume you thought making evidence for young universe will somehow convince @paterfamilias.
@Heavens Declare had some plan to convert you. How, no idea. Anyway, he claims I and @MeganC screw that plan.
I don't like to talk publically about someone without putting @ and informing that person.
That's improper like gossiping person in room.
Dude! Chill out! I'm just remarking on how funny it is that all these threads get derailed at some point or other! It's not that big of a deal!
By presenting solid concrete evidence despite what you and @MeganC think of it.
I did put an @ in there.
If evidence is solid, arguably best researcher and thinker of forum would praise it.
I'm answering to @paterfamilias why I'm using @.
Yes and no and you are unable to determine what will or will not influence me, nor do you know what I do or do not know and do please believe me on this, I am not some low IQ and low information type who fails to think in the broadest possible terms.
There is literally zero failure on my part in this equation. You simply have an opinion.
As a sidebar for you...I don't have the foggiest clue what information you claim to have provided me. It is not that I may well have consumed the data and could be tested on it but it is that I am a bit blind in some areas.
I don't bother that much with remembering account names of people I don't know in real life. Unless it is work related and then thatvis a separate compartment. Assume that I am being literal in the blindness description. It applies to faces, names and a few other odd areas as well...lyrics for example.
So, I may well know the topic that you are referring to but not connect it with you.
If we were sitting across the fire ring and having the conversation and I consumed the data then I would associate it with you but here in pure text I lack the context to get that particular box to open.
@MeganC
I am curious if yours works this way.
I had a couple of interactions in fairly short order in face to face conversations that has me paying more attention to it and being mildly annoyed in detail.
Meh...go ahead and talk about me with or without the tagging. I am not nathered either way.
I like the idea of the rigid etiquette though.