Latest activity

We are thoroughly enjoying this book!

Brother, same encouragement applies here as was made to a different poster. No need to get personal and heated right out the gate or make judgments on folks without getting to know us all a bit first. Let’s post and get familiar. You’ll have...

Brother, same encouragement applies here as was made to a different poster. No need to get personal and heated right out the gate or make judgments on folks without getting to know us all a bit first. Let’s post and get familiar. You’ll have...

I just heard about this recently. For me it is another help in figuring out some of my inner battles. Another outside perspective that can help us figure out how to make positive changes. https://quiz.attachmentproject.com/

What excellent advice. Tucked in my heart’ ❤️

Thank you for sharing @Stanfam7 this amazing encounter with you friend. It was a true kindness of God for him to lay things out in the way he did for you and your friend. Hold on to the memories of that day when other conversations don't go...

To be consistent, I guess it has to mean that.

We are thoroughly enjoying this book!

Interesting. But if the father refuses the Union, and can only takes the payment, is that considered divorce by proxy?

Then argue why you disagree with the manuscript’s validity, not the credentials of the person promoting them. Yes, that’s the purpose of this forum. Those are not necessarily directly related to polygyny. But, people are allowed to have...

What you are observing is a group of people doing what you encouraged all of us to do…searching the scriptures. Verses are found. They are read. They are taken at strict face value. That might seem legalistic, but it’s actually just basic...

So now it’s a pissing contest of whose credentials are greater? You’ve been a part of this forum since…this month? Prove yourself first before dismissing others. Your whole argument up to this point is calling someone a novice without...

I like these examples. I think they’re good evidence. If we are being 100% honest, they are implicit, not explicit commands for polygyny. I’m not sure these are a slam dunk, but they can be deduced to at least allowing the possibility of...

Then argue why you disagree with the manuscript’s validity, not the credentials of the person promoting them. Yes, that’s the purpose of this forum. Those are not necessarily directly related to polygyny. But, people are allowed to have...

I don’t disagree that they’re in the proof category. I’m just saying they’re in the implicit category.