• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Latest activity

  • steve
    steve reacted to frederick's post in the thread Where with Like Like.
    This website has a specific primary focus, which is Biblical Families. There are other sites that have a different primary focus to cater to people with those needs or interests, e.g. creation ministries, home education, etc.. Here, we help...
  • paterfamilias
    I just read a terrible pulp article about a woman who had "escaped" a "cult" of polygamy. Super lame....it was a woman in her 30s who had grown up in a Mormon funny family with 4 moms. Boo frickety hoo. Do please imagine the degree to which I...
  • paterfamilias
    Your damn Skippy it doesn't mean you have to I am as eager for more kids as any guy you will encounter, but I was offered a much younger woman on a proverbial platter a while back who made the claim that all she wanted in life was loads of kids...
  • Edward
    Edward reacted to steve's post in the thread Hello everyone! with Like Like.
    Hardly anyone was salivating. Most were urging caution and discussing whether or not there was a need for concern.
  • Edward
    Edward reacted to frederick's post in the thread Hello everyone! with Haha Haha.
  • paterfamilias
    paterfamilias reacted to frederick's post in the thread Hello everyone! with Like Like.
    A lot more of the discussion took place on the Real People thread. Start about here and you can fill in some details: https://biblicalfamilies.org/forum/threads/real-people.15101/page-11
  • frederick
    frederick replied to the thread Where.
    This website has a specific primary focus, which is Biblical Families. There are other sites that have a different primary focus to cater to people with those needs or interests, e.g. creation ministries, home education, etc.. Here, we help...
  • steve
    steve replied to the thread Head covering.
    These are public discussions, after all.
  • steve
    steve replied to the thread Where.
    People come to this site for information and support. Is it necessary for it to go anywhere?
  • steve
    My understanding is that Congress authorizing the security upgrades does in fact authorize the structure.
  • steve
    For real on this one! This protects not only our president but visiting dignitaries and all those associated with running our government. As much as we like to hate on the government, it is far better than anarchy!!
  • Mojo
    Mojo replied to the thread The UFO/UAP disclosures of May 2026.
    This congressman is claiming he’s heard there’s not just alien life form but machinery as well? Stuff as large as a football field? Hmmm? Exaggerated yarns? Legit findings?
  • Mojo
    I’m a little confused. Is this an end around to approve and budget the building so as to get the project moving and out of the courts, while still allowing the private funds to remain as the primary funding mechanism, or is this footing the bill...
  • Mojo
    Mojo replied to the thread The UFO/UAP disclosures of May 2026.
    UAP
  • A
    Asforme&myhouse replied to the thread Head covering.
    Someone else engaged with a comment I posted a long time ago. I was responding to him and you jumped in the middle of it.
Back
Top